Tom and Jerry: Defenders of All Things Right and Good

Tuesday, April 11, 2006

I had to respond

The Observer printed this letter on April 6th:

University President Father John Jenkins attempted to close Pandora's Box in his "Closing Statement on Academic Freedom and Catholic Character." I, for one, had hoped that the University community would cultivate the discussion that arose out of Jenkins' speech on January 23, 2006 into a broad dialogue encompassing topics well beyond the initial issues. There are many policies existing at the University of Notre Dame, both official and unofficial, that are repugnant to Catholic doctrines. However, now that we've "settled" the gender issues, Jenkins seems unwilling to tackle any of the more difficult topics.

Take, for example, the University's position on the war in Iraq. Oh yes, the University most definitely has a position, which it clearly expresses through the Notre Dame ROTC Program. Now, anyone perceived as critical of the ROTC program opens himself up to a tidal wave of counter-attacks of being "unpatriotic," etc. In order to keep the focus on the real issue, academic freedom, I would like to clarify that I am not criticizing the ROTC program, only using it as a barometer of the University's support for the war. The University not only allows, but encourages the armed forces to recruit students and prospective students into the ROTC program. The University works in conjunction with the ROTC program to use University land, facilities and staff to promote and execute that recruitment (these same things constituted "sponsorship" with regards to the Queer Film Festival and Vagina Monologues).

The University does this in spite of Fort Wayne-South Bend Bishop John D'Arcy's unequivocal sponsorship for the Vatican's position that the war in Iraq does not comport with Catholic doctrine of just war. The University backs the war notwithstanding the fact that the Catholic Church considers it immoral, but withdrew its "sponsorship" for the Vagina Monologues and the Queer Film Festival because the Catholic Church considers them immoral.

This apparent incongruity begs the question: what is so different about the war that President Jenkins closes debate before our community can discuss its place within the University's Catholic character? If any issue merits vigorous debate within the University's Catholic morality, it is the war. The University's ROTC program has trained hundreds of officers who have gone on to tours in Iraq since the war began there is even an Army ROTC Club of Iraq). Those officers have bravely and dutifully executed the policies of their Commander-in-Chief, policies that the Catholic Church considers unjust. Why isn't Jenkins leading (instead of stifling) the University in a discussion of how the University can maintain this support for the war in the face of its Catholic character?

Is it because Jenkins' concern over the gender issues was just a veiled response to the Board of Trustees and other powerful alumni? Is it because the University cannot afford to lose the economic juggernaut that is the Notre Dame ROTC program? I would like to believe the reason is simply that the University wishes not to offend its proud ROTC heritage. However, I am not quite that optimistic.

I invite Jenkins to prove me wrong, and reopen the discussion on academic freedom, starting with the topic of the University's position on the war. If he refuses, I would like to challenge the community to force the issue. If our community can engage in the sort of passionate and intelligent dialogue that surrounded the Vagina Monologues and the Queer Film Festival, surely we can handle Iraq.

James Parrot
class of 1999
April 5

I just had to respond. Here is what the Observer printed:

In his April 5 letter ("Pandora's box"), James Parrot argues that the presence of ROTC on Notre Dame's campus constitutes endorsement of the war in Iraq. Not so. The training of military officers has been part of Notre Dame's history for over sixty years, well before our country went to war in Iraq. Sustaining an ROTC program does not constitute endorsement of any particular military action, it simply recognizes the Church sanctioned right of nations to raise armies and defend themselves.

Since Parrot chose to compare sponsorship of ROTC with endorsement of "The Vagina Monologues," let me make another comparison. Unlike prostitution, sexual abuse of a minor and extramarital sex, which are always morally wrong, the rightness or wrongness of a particular military action is a matter of prudential judgment. George Weigel in the January 2003 issue of "First Things" offers a compelling argument justifying the invasion of Iraq in light of Catholic just war tradition.

Archbishop O'Brien of the Archdiocese of the Military Services says Catholics may, in good conscience, participate in the Iraq war. Catholic moral teaching allows room for
disagreement on this issue. Even if Notre Dame were to officially support the war in Iraq, it would not necessarily be contradicting the teachings of the Church. A discussion about the war in Iraq would be a good thing, but please leave the ROTC programs out of it.

Tom Aranda
Class of 1995
April 8


  • Maybe its just me, but why is it important that ND have a "position" on Iraq. I am sure that some or all of the professors at the school would surely cry foul if the school's president declared University support one way or the other. Do you know of any university that is not a military academy (run by DOD, thus bound by the President's National Security Policy) that has a "position" on Iraq?

    I will assume the answer is "No." So then, why would our stripling commentator, James, even bring it up except to be politically divisive and throw spears at ND's endorsement of ROTC in a general sense. He portends not to be "critical of the ROTC program." However, it is clear that he has some ill will towards it being on campus, and I would venture to say that feeling probably extends to the military in general. What troubles me most is that he was very quick to point out that criticism of the ROTC program would be labeled "unpatriotic" and yet he couldn't come right out and say that's what his problem was. He has every right to be "unpatriotic." People like you and I serve to protect that right. But, please don't be disingenuous. If you want to throw a spear, then throw a spear. Don't hide behind some sort of percieved doctinal misstep by the University. I wish James was courageous enough to say what he really meant. Maybe even he doesn't know what that is????

    By Blogger Joe C, at Tuesday, April 11, 2006 11:14:00 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home